
I have a joke with one of my friends, another kindergarten teacher, that I have an altar in my house dedicated to education writer Alfie Kohn, to which I bow down every day. If I do have such a thing (and I'm not saying), here is one reason why:
NCLB: ‘Too Destructive To Salvage’
by Alfie KohnIt’s time to say in a national newspaper what millions of teachers, students and parents already know: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is an appalling and unredeemable experiment that has done incalculable damage to our schools — particularly those serving poor, minority and limited-English-proficiency students.
It’s a stretch even to call the law “well-intentioned” given that its creators, including the Bush administration and the right-wing Heritage Foundation, want to privatize public education. Hence NCLB’s merciless testing, absurd timetables and reliance on threats.
Let’s be clear: This law has nothing to do with improving learning. At best, it’s about raising scores on multiple-choice exams. This law is not about discovering which schools need help; we already know. This law is not about narrowing the achievement gap; its main effect has been to sentence poor children to an endless regimen of test-preparation drills. Thus, even if the scores do rise, it’s at the expense of a quality education. Affluent schools are better able to maintain good teaching — and retain good teachers — despite NCLB, so the gap widens.
Sure, it’s senseless for Washington to impose requirements without adequate funding. But more money to implement a bad law isn’t the answer.
Indeed, according to a recent 50-state survey by Teachers Network, a non-profit education organization, exactly 3% of teachers think NCLB helps them to teach more effectively. No wonder 129 education and civil rights organizations have endorsed a letter to Congress deploring the law’s overemphasis on standardized testing and punitive sanctions. No wonder 30,000 people (so far) have signed a petition at educatorroundtable.org calling the law “too destructive to salvage.”
NCLB didn’t invent the scourge of high-stakes testing, nor is it responsible for the egregious disparity between the education received by America’s haves and have-nots. But by intensifying the former, it exacerbates the latter.
This law cannot be fixed by sanding its rough edges. It must be replaced with a policy that honors local autonomy, employs better assessments, addresses the root causes of inequity and supports a rich curriculum. The question isn’t how to save NCLB; it’s how to save our schools — and kids — from NCLB.
It was distressing, when NCLB first reared its ugly head, to see the number of politicos who signed onto it. (Even Dennis Kucinich!!) Did any one of them even think to ask a teacher what s/he thought? Because this is nothing new. The problem with NCLB has never been the fact that it is chock full of unfunded mandates, but that it is LOUSY POLICY, embraced by people who know NOTHING about children and learning.
And, like absolutely every last Bush Administration initiative, the first question should always be this: WHO PROFITS? From duct tape to war, all you have to do is follow the money.










