This set me thinking about the little man who is not my president. My first thought was, "He's never been my president." One thing that really bothers me is, how after 9/11™, the airwaves and print media were filled with people who should have known better saying things like, "We have to support him. He's our President."
There are a couple of prominent examples: The cartoonist/humorist Ted Rall wrote an essay after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, saying something to the effect of, "They attacked us. We can't just turn the other cheek." To which I said, "Why not?" It's easy to be anti-war when there isn't a war on. It is extremely hard to be anti-war at the outset of a war, yet that is exactly what Jesus was preaching. Ted Rall took the coward's road, and I have not been able to enjoy his writing since then.
The other example is the NPR talking head (or is it a talking voice when it's on the radio?) Scott Simon, who identified himself as a Quaker and then spoke eloquently in favor of the bombing of Afghanistan. The effect this had was to give the general notion that the majority of Quakers (and for those of you who may not know, the Religious Society of Friends or Quakers is one of the historic peace churches) supported the invasion, which was absolutely not the case. I had a colleague say to me, "But the Quakers think the invasion is a good thing!" It was appalling. I have heard that Scott Simon made peace with his Monthly Meeting, but I have had a hard time making peace with Scott Simon! (Which probably isn't very Quakerly.)
So now it is seven years later, and opposition to the war and to the policies of BushCheneyInc. has grown exponentially, a trend for which I am truly grateful. But sometimes I am angry, furious, enraged, thinking "How could you NOT have known then?" There were many people who know how bad it all was and tried to speak out, but there were so many more -- thinking, progressive people -- who practiced self-censorship (the worst kind) and wished that the rest of us would do the same. People for whom, literally overnight, the president who stole the election became "my President."
Just look at the mess we're in now. My younger daughter talks all the time about how she is going to move to Europe when she's old enough. And though it breaks my heart to contemplate it, I hope she does! It feels as if, in the last seven years, my children's future has evaporated. Poof! Gone.
My mood matches the November weather outside. Cold. Grey. Half-hearted drizzle.
Moving right along with Saturday morning thoughts -- although now it is eleven minutes past noon -- I finished reading Terry Pratchett's Making Money. As I said before, I love his books. When I say that, people often respond, "I tried reading one of them once, but I couldn't get into it." And to all you TP nay-sayers, I say "Try again!" But don't begin at the beginning. His earlier Discworld books, such as The Color of Magic, are not nearly as good as his more recent offerings. So here are a few suggestions:
Going Postal followed by Making Money. (They go together, sort of.)
The Monstrous Regiment
The Wee Free Men, followed by A Hat Full of Sky.
Small Gods
Pratchett nerds go to L-Space and read the books following characters they like, instead of necessarily reading the series chronologically. The characters I most like to follow are Sam Vimes (a cop) and Granny Weatherwax (a witch.) For you librarians out there, Pratchett has created one of the most memorable librarians ever. Ook! If you like zombies, werewolves, trolls, vampires, and dwarves and believe in affirmative action, you may like these books.
I'll leave you with a passage I enjoyed in Making Money. The background is, an ancient army of golems has descended on the city of Ankh-Morpork. Lord Vetinari is the city Patrician, who may or may not be a tyrant. The city is in an uproar over what to do.
"Any of the other cities would attack us if they had these golems," said Lord Downey, "... Surely a bit of conquest would be in order?"
"An empirette, perhaps?" said Vetinari, sourly. "We use our slaves to create more slaves? But do we want to face the whole world in arms? For that is what we would do, at the finish. The best we could hope for is that some of us survive. The worst is that we would triumph. Triumph and rot. That is the lesson of history, Lord Downey. Are we not rich enough?"
Off to get my hair cut. I pray that I do not come home with "car crash bangs." But that is another post.





12 comments:
Why was it that, before this stupid war began, so few progressives stopped to think about the fact that, if we don't go to war, the possibility may exist that innocent people could get killed, but if we do go to war, it's an absolute certainty that innocent people will die. I kept hearing the argument "but 'they' attacked us first. We can't let 'them' get away with it and do nothing. If we do nothing, 'they' might attack again." So we kill thousands of our own, and even more innocent civilians overseas, to keep "them" from, maybe, killing again. I didn't get it then, and I still don't. Sigh.
What gets me is the distinction between "good" and "bad" wars. Many people have come around to believing that THIS war is bad, presumably because too many of OUR soldiers are dying, but I get the sense that those same people will be easily duped into the next war. I want to shout from the rooftop, "Wake up! It's not THIS war or THAT war. It's ALL war that is bad!"
Hi Suzy and Ed,
I recommend "Jingo." In my opinion, it's Pratchett's best commentary on (unnecessary) war. And it features one of my favorite characters, the Machiavellian Lord Vetinari...
Beth
Yes, I hear you on Scott Simon who calls himself a Quaker. He may actually be one. Afterall, we Quakers are human beings who occasionally do stupid things, get scared, etc. In my Meeting, I've encountered several individual Friends who have made the statement: "We need a draft so the war will stop" or my favorite, which you alluded to in your post: "Well, I'm against the Iraq war but I feel um, differently, about the Afghan war". Gosh, what about the Peace Testimony?
Ok, I'll ask: what exactly are "car crash bangs"? I thought you were going to get a bun! What happened to that plan?:-))
PD -- If you're really really nice I'll tell you about car crash bangs sometime.
A Nonny Mouse -- Yes, Jingo is an excellent one. It also has Leonard of Quirm, another great character. I also love Lu Tse and the Monks of Time. Actually, the ONLY Pratchett character I don't particularly care for is Rincewind.
I want to forgive Scott Simon, because he actually read a complaint letter I once wrote to NPR on his show, but he's been irritating me for years now. When he's not being pretentious, he's being condescending. And inconsistent. And his obviously pro-war stance is annoying.
I also tried to read his novel about the Yugoslavian war, and it turned my stomach with its gratuitous sexual violence.
Attacking the entire country of Afghanistan because they were sheltering bin Laden never made tactical sense to me, especially from my perspective as an armchair historian. NO outside power has EVER been able to "conquer" this part of the world, but hey, why let a little history get in the way of your agenda?
And I am convinced that Bush deliberately let Osama get away, so he'd have him available as a convenient boogey man as needed.
As for mr. Pratchett, I did try the first Discworld book and just couldn't get into it. I'll try the little list you have here...
When I get well. I've been pretty sick lately. I could use a little "holding in the Light" right now, if you can. Thanks.
Beth: Yes, Jingo is a ggod one. Vetinari is one of my favorite characters, too, along with Leonard of Quirm, Lu Tse, Susan Sto Helit, there are so many. Small Gods and Monstrous Regiment also have pretty strong anti-war, religious dogma themes. One gets the feeling that Mr. Pratchett was listening to Steeleye Span while writing Monstrous Regiment. An abomination unto Nuggan!
QD: I'm sorry to hear you're not in good health. Holding you in the light...
As you can imagine I never voted for and do not support Bush. When reich wingers in this country said that Clinton, a man legally elected, was not their President I took it with a grain of salt. When Bush was installed in office by SCOTUS I told them he was in no way my President, they turned around and called me a traitor. Oh the irony.
Okay, you and Mr. Ether conivinced me, I'll give Pratchett's books another try, but only after I finish the three other books I got now and whatever book if any Sparky gets me for Christmas.
For Christmas? I recommend a little book about a boy named Dick and a girl named Jane. There are some people named Mother and Father in it too. Scintillating reading! Tell Sparky. But don't buy it at Amazon ...
My sister gave me a stack of Pratchett books. I'm reading Thud right now. His stuff is pretty funny.
Funny ... and smart. And not mean.
Post a Comment